Science diplomacy has long been understood as the set of activities operating at the intersection of science and foreign policy, often with science positioned as a tool to be instrumentalized in moments of tension or as a mechanism of competition. Histories of science and science and technology studies remind us that the relationship between science and global relations has always been essential, yet the many ways in which science diplomacy unfolds in practice are still being unpacked in all their complexity.
Today, the field of science diplomacy stands at a significant turning point. This reflects a shifting global landscape, marked by emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing, which function both as tools for diplomatic engagement and as sources of competition; increasingly complex and tension-filled multipolar power relations and urgent planetary challenges. Against this backdrop, science and the diplomatic power it wields is frequently cast in political discourse as the essential key to both addressing these challenges and securing competitive advantage on the global stage.
This moment represents an opportunity to broaden and enrich the field: to make space for fresh perspectives and approaches to the topic and to invite those already working on science diplomacy to consider where multiple conceptions of “science” and multiple understandings of “diplomacy” intersect, conflict and co-exist. Part of this broadening involves moving beyond the traditional focus on the so-called hard sciences and engineering to more fully examine how the intersection of diplomacy and science plays out across a wider range of fields, including the social and human sciences.
We ask: Where can we imagine new ground—and new grounding—for science diplomacy? What practices, perspectives, and possibilities have we overlooked when thinking about how science exists at the intersection of its epistemic and diplomatic dimensions?
Approaching the concept and field of science diplomacy as part of a larger ecosystem of knowledge, power, and global relations requires critically rethinking its foundations and its futures. This means interrogating inherited assumptions, experimenting with new analytical frames, and asking what has been neglected or excluded. For example:
The program is preliminary, and changes may occur. Further details will follow shortly.
16 June 2026
09:00-09:30 Welcome and Coffee
09:30-11:00 Panel 1: Preliminary Panel title: Science Diplomacy and Security - 3 papers TBA
11:00-11:30 Break
11:30-13:00 Panel 2: Preliminary Panel title: international scientific collaboration I - 3 papers TBA
13:00-14:00 Lunch
14:00-15:30 Round table: Science Diplomacy and the role of academic institutions (Description follows)
15:30-16:00 Coffee break
16:00-17:30 Panel 3: Preliminary Panel title: Space and Science Diplomacy - 3 papers TBA
18:00 Reception at AIAS followed by drinks in town
17 June 2026
09:00-10 30 Panel 4 Preliminary Panel title: international scientific collaboration II - 3 papers TBA
10.30-11:00 Coffee break
11:00 -12:30 Panel 5: Preliminary Panel title: Practitioners’ imagining new ground in Science Diplomacy - 3 papers TBA
12:30-14:15 Lunch and poster session (6 posters selected)
14:15-15.45 Panel 6: Preliminary Panel title: Science Diplomacy and the public - 3 papers TBA
15:45-16:00 Break
16:00-16:30 Closing discussion
Registration is now open. Please register here.
The workshop is open to all, researchers, practitioners, officials and others, interested in the topics listed above. Participation in the workshop is free of charge, but participants will need to cover their own travel and accommodation expenses.
Please find a document with list of hotels here (the list starts with the pricier hotels) and guidance on how to get to Aarhus here.
The conference is organised by the AIAS-Science Diplomacy Theme-group consisting of four fellows:
Casper Andersen, Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Denmark
Maria Rentetzi, Department of Science Technology and Gender Studies, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Matteo de Donà, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden
Rachel Fishberg, Department of Political Science at Aarhus University, Denmark